|
|
Sieg
Heil - Shalom
The
Diary of Hans Frank or Anti-Semitism, Hitler and the Occult
It
comes as no surprise to find the Islamic Party of Britain listed,
however unjustifiably, among groups accused of anti-Semitism, by the
Institute for Jewish Policy Research and the American Jewish
Committee based in London. To accuse any genuine Muslim of being
anti-Semitic, regardless of his ethnic belonging, when the Qur'an
directs us to love and emulate the deeds of all the Semitic prophets
including Abraham, Lot, Isaac, Ishmael, Jacob, Joseph, Job, Moses,
David, John and Jesus - peace be upon them all - is as patently
disingenuous as it is absurd particularly when the president
of this self-appointed body, the Lord Rothschild, is a 'false
Israelite', a non-semitic Jew, as are most of those who champion
this particularly rabid cause.
It
is especially galling to be criticised by a body headed by a
Rothschild, whose family history, since they arrived in this
country, has been appalling, particularly that of Nathan in the last
century and Victor, the previous Lord Rothschild in this, who was
rightly dubbed by the Daily Express in October 1994 as 'Britain's
great traitor', the notorious 'fifth man', the great communist super
spy, from the 'Cambridge Apostles', an occult group which included
Guy Burgess, Donald Maclean, Kim Philby, and Sir Anthony Blunt. The
intellectual brotherhood known as the 'Apostles' was founded in 1820
by twelve Evangelical undergraduates at Cambridge. Anthony Blunt
became a member in 1928, Victor Rothschild and Guy Burgess on
November 12th, 1932. John Costello, in his 'The Mask of Treachery',
says that John Maynard Keynes, a friend of Victor Rothschild and a
former member of his Elite Secret Society, described the activities
of the Apostles as 'the higher sodomy'.
After
Marxist Socialism, the second most destructive cult this century,
National Socialism, was born out of the Thule Society, headed by
Dietrich Eckart, acknowledged as the spiritual founder of the Nazi
Party, and listed by Adolf Hitler on the last page of Mein Kampf as
among "the sixteen heroes who fell in the Munich Putsch",
who "sacrificed themselves for us all... among them I want also
to count that man, one of the best who devoted his life to the
awakening to his, our people, in his writings and his thoughts and
finally his deeds: Dietrich Eckart." 'Hitler's Table Talk',
published by Weidenfeld & Nicholson in 1953, states that when
seated under a picture of Eckart, in the senate canteen in 1941,
Hitler is reported to have said:
"It is a heartbreaking grief
to me that Dietrich Eckart did not live to see the party's
rise."
In previous editions of Common Sense, we have
touched upon the economic factors and the Western financiers who
brought Herr Hitler to prominence, including the occultist Montagu
Norman, the Nazi governor of the Bank of England.
What,
however, is less well known is the secret or occult dimension to the
whole sordid enterprise. Conspicuous by its absence from all the
arguments raised by the Institute for Jewish Policy Research and the
Zionist establishment is a constitutional ability to be honest and
just when it comes to the part played by Jews, Semitic or otherwise,
in the rise of Nazism and Bolshevism. From intelligence gathered
from Jewish converts to Islam, it is well known by the Jewish
establishment that the second architect of the Nazi movement was
Alfred Rosenberg, of whom Trevor Ravenscroft, author of the 'Spear
of Destiny' had this to say in chapter 7, 'The Anti-Christ of the
Protocols':
"The key to the rise of fame of Alfred Rosenberg,
born the son of an impoverished shoemaker, was in the possession of
a secret manuscript which he smuggled out of Moscow. The promotion
of this man, who rose to become the Reichsleiter of the Nazi Party
and its official philosopher, came about because he presented Adolf
Hitler with a blueprint to total power. 'The Protocols of the
Wisemen of Zion' purported to be a record of the proceedings of the
World Congress of Jewry held in Basel in 1897 at which, it was
claimed, plans were laid and resolutions carried towards achieving
world domination... Rosenberg, despite his Jewish antecedents,
gained entry into the Thule Gesellschaft by showing the 'Protocols'
to Dietrich."
The possibility that Adolf Hitler, like
Rosenberg, had a Jewish pedigree, promotes either stony silence, or
incandescent denials. However, as the saying goes, there can't be
smoke without fire? Ken Anderson in 'Hitler and the Occult' gives
the following account:
"Rumour and conjecture about Hitler's
Jewishness dogged him from early in his rise to power.
A
story in the United Kingdom's 'Daily Mirror' on 14 October 1933
helped greatly in fuelling the speculation. A journalist had found a
grave in the jewish cemetery in Bucharest which was inscribed with
Hebrew characters 'Adolf Hitler'. The Mirror alleged that the grave
belonged to the grandfather of "Germany's anti-Semitic
chancellor... the headstone and death certificate gave this
(particular Jewish) Hitler's birth date as 1832, which would have
made him only five years older than Adolf's father... However, the
most compelling claim for Hitler's ancestry came eighteen months
after his death in the Berlin bunker. Hans Frank, who had been
Hitler's legal adviser and governor-general of Poland from
1939 to 1945, was facing the gallows at the Nuremberg trials and
declared he did not want to leave behind any 'unatoned guilt' (he
embraced Catholicism in prison). As part of his confession he wrote
a document in which he said that towards the end of 1930 he had, at
Hitler's request, made some confidential inquiries into a letter
Hitler had received from a relative which he declared amounted to a
'disgusting piece of blackmail'. The letter declared that Hitler had
'Jewish blood in his veins!' Frank's enquiries elicited the
information that Hitler's father was the illegitimate son of a woman
by name of Maria Anna Schicklgruber from Leonding, near Linz (in
Austria), who worked as a cook. When she gave birth to Alois she was
in service with a Jewish family by the name of Frankenberger."
Other accounts state that no Jew by the name of Frankenberger had
ever lived in Austria during the 19th century. According to 'The
Unknown Hitler' by Schwarzwaller, Maria Anna gave birth to Alois on
June 7, 1837, in Strones, near Doellersheim, and when asked who the
father was she refused to say. Another, and perhaps more likely,
possibility is that offered by Major C.H. Douglas in his erudite
analysis of the situation, which is one of the reasons why he still
receives a hostile press. In 'The Big Idea', pages 50-51, he stated
in 1942:
"Had Germany won the 1914-1918 phase of the war, the
United States would soon have been put in her place. As soon as it
became evident that Germany had lost the first trick, and the Jews
had won it by the dismemberment of Russia (in 1917) and the control
of the Russian development along Talmudic lines, the whole weight of
this group was directed to obtaining of the Armistice via the
United States. The decline of the British Empire, and the rise of
Hitlerian (Totalitarian) Germany is the direct result of this
control...
The
link between the international Jew Financiers and such politicians
as can be easily identified as having facilitated this plot (whether
knowingly or because it is part of the equipment of a successful
politician) is undoubtedly secret societies such as Grand Orient
Freemasonry and the New york B'Nai B'rith. What is the bearing of
English Freemasonry on the matter, I am not clear... What bearing,
if any, on more recent events, the fairly well established fact that
Hitler is the grandson of an illegitimate daughter of Baron
Rothschild of Vienna has I do not know. But the naive idea that
attention should be focused on the largely verbal 'anti-Semitism' of
German, rather than the Talmudic Jew policy and philosophy [courtesy
of Rosenberg and the Protocols] which has been steadily pursued
equally by Hitler as by the Kaiser with his entourage of Ballin,
Rathenau, Bleichroeder and many others, ought by now be
untenable."
The joint signatures of Max Warburg and Adolf
Hitler on a money document dated March 16th, 1933, sheds a lot more
light on the role of the usurers and their wars. Can there be any
further doubt that we are living in the days of the Anti-Christ of
the protocols?
Author: Islamic Party
of Britain |
Date Published:
Spring
1995 |
Back To Top
|
|