Common
Sense has been absent for a while: not just as the publication of
the Islamic Party of Britain, but also in the real world. The
large-scale burning of carcasses of both healthy and diseased
animals must be a clear sign to future historians that we have
finally lost our balance completely. Would you kill all of your
family because grandpa had the flue and might die from it? Foot and
Mouth disease is an entirely curable infection, and it tends to
afflict mainly weak animals. Destroying all livestock does not
eliminate the causes, however. One large contributing factor has
been intensive farming methods resulting in depleted soil, unnatural
feeding practices (which also gave us BSE) and over-bred animals
with low resistance. As the wholesale replacement of livestock will
push small farmers out of business and favour large corporations,
the problem will have been made worse rather than better.
For
our single-minded politicians (punching Prescott comes to mind) such
matters do not give them sleepless nights, and all eyes now turn to
the forthcoming election. Even though common sense was suddenly
re-invented by the Conservative Party, there is little sense in the
manifestos of any of the contesters. No amount of bickering over who
should pay how much tax on what will disguise the fact the Britons
have been, and will be, ripped off no matter who occupies 10 Downing
Street. The interest on the accumulated national debt alone amounts
to an annual 40 billion pound. This is money taken from
everybody’s hard work and given to the banks in addition to the
fees they charge their customers. It is money given to them for
having created, by government permission, the money supply of the
country: out of thin air, backed by nothing but the country’s
capability to produce wealth. If the government created its own
money without an interest charge attached (as it does on a very
small scale in the form of what is known as the M0 aggregate), we
could be saved these horrendous penalty payments, and the country
would prosper. However, no government will try, for they know they
would be sacked: not by the British people, but by their masters,
the banks.
This
is why the Tories probably won’t win the next election, even
though everybody is disillusioned with New Labour (an old story
now). The banks want European-wide control, and British autonomy as
advocated by some “Keep-the-Pound”-Tories does not suit the
equation. Polling day will probably see some redistribution between
Labour and Liberals. The print and broadcast media, paid by the same
financial institutions, will see to that. And whilst the BBC is
meant to be independent (paid for by the licence fees of people who
don’t even watch its programmes or simply want to play their own
video tapes on their own video machine – talk about extortion),
you will be hard pressed to find a genuine discussion of our
monetary system on any of its programmes. Who creates our money and
why? is the big taboo question of our age. Money is power, and
Rip-off Britain must continue undisturbed.
We
thought, therefore, it was time for another issue of Common Sense,
even though we now prefer to use our web site (www.islamicparty.com)
for the dissemination of information. It allows for a quicker
response to events and creates less overheads than a print copy,
although we know there are “Luddites” in our ranks who do not
want to embrace the new medium. This issue is intended to raise some
of the issues parliamentary candidates should be confronted with
when coming to rake in our votes.
Other
organisations have published material for the election. Some, like
the Muslim Council of Britain’s “Electing to Listen” document,
stick safely with education and health (and the weather?). Others
have tried the root of appeasement, rubbing shoulders with those in
office. At a recent (government-sponsored) award dinner organised by
The Muslim News, those present were flattered that the prime
minister honoured them with his presence and grand smile and
intimated to them that he had read from a chapter called “The
Cattle” in the Qur’an. However convenient a reference at the
time of the Foot and Mouth crisis this might have been, it also
showed that he had a lot more reading to do: seeing that The Cattle
is only the second chapter of the Qur’an. More mature Muslims
should judge politicians by what they do, not by what they claim to
read.
We
have held busy negotiations with a number of constituencies with
regard to putting up Islamic Party candidates during this election.
In the end we decided not to. The political landscape has changed as
far as Muslims are concerned: there is now a desire to challenge the
sitting MPs who have for too long taken the Muslim vote for granted.
However, there is still not enough confidence within the communities
to tackle an election campaign, and for the time being political
energy should probably best be channelled into individual campaigns,
for example, the boycott of Marks and Spencer due to the company’s
overt support for Zionism, to mention a particular laudable cause.
Come the next election in four years’ time (when things can
“only get better” because the government of the day – no
matter what persuasion – will have made them worse), and maybe the
time will have come to take the Islamic alternative to the streets.
Author: Islamic
Party of Britain |
Date Published:
May
2001 |
Back To Top