|
|
Below is the text of an editorial by Common
Sense editor Sahib Mustaqim Bleher for
issue
25 (2nd Quarter 1999) on the topic of the use of
propaganda against Islam.
The War of Words
Our age has perfected the
black art of propaganda. Goebbels would have gone green with
jealousy had he been able to watch a preview of CNN, and even George
Orwell could not have imagined in his wildest dreams that his idea
of "doublespeak" would be employed so efficiently by journalists
today. We live in a time where, in the words of the prophet
Muhammad, peace be upon him, the word is sharper than the sword. To
win a battle, we must first win the argument.
This is a daunting task,
and the raison d'être for the Islamic Party of Britain from the
outset. Persistent brain-washing has produced a situation where most
people readily accept contradictions and double-standards simply
because they are the accepted norm. An Israeli pervert can win the
Eurovision song contests, and nobody asks why a country in the
Middle East is considered part of Europe. Why is Jordan not also a
contestant? or if the link with Europe is an historic one, why not
America? Likewise, protestors who burned an Israeli flag outside
Wembley Conference Centre, where the "Israel 50" celebrations were
held, got themselves arrested, whereas protestors burning a Japanese
flag in sight of the Japanese emperor where shown on television with
the police looking on. Listening to the news one could easily
believe that human suffering is not a universal experience, as only
the suffering of "our lot" seems to qualify. The apartheid state of
Israel would never consider paying reparations or returning
confiscated property to Palestinians, nor would Britain ever
apologise for the atrocities committed by the Empire.
Whilst the sun may have
finally set on the British empire, the interference in the affairs
of other peoples continues unabated. And so does the cover-up
through propaganda. The attacks on Iraq's perceived capability to
poison the water supplies of the world with a bacterial contaminant
hide the allied responsibility for the use of depleted uranium and
biological weapons in the gulf war, surfaced here through the gulf
war syndrome phenomenon, and stop people from probing into the
merciless killing of innocent Iraqi men, women and children through
the brutal application of sanctions. Similarly, the accusations
against the Sudanese government standing in the way of aid delivery
to South Sudan mask the tremendous efforts that government has
undertaken in difficult circumstances to absorb the flood of
refugees from the South as well as that the peace offer they have
made is a great deal more generous than the celebrated deal for
Northern Ireland.
Moreover, no mention is
made that the government of Khartoum did not instigate an Islamic
campaign against the Christian South, but inherited the problem of
the war from the days of British rule, just as British financiers
brought Hitler to power and kept his war machine going. Britain
cleverly manoeuvred Japan into the war for her own ends, just as
America enticed Iraq into invading Kuwait after having armed him
sufficiently to do so. As always, decisions were taken out of
strategic interest and to secure the exploitation of resources. The
cherished principles of freedom and democracy were a mere veneer to
justify the underlying motives. The suffering of ordinary people
never mattered. British war veterans should ask their own government
for an apology for feeding them to the canons.
Muslims, and other
believers, must wake up to the war of deception which has replaced
the war of attrition. That only the truth will set us free still
holds true today, but a virtual monopoly on information
dissemination makes establishing the truth increasingly difficult.
Opinion-shapers, numbing our sense of responsibility by presenting
twisted facts sugar-coated with light entertainment, have become the
magicians of our time. The staff of Moses will be needed to swallow
up the illusions they have created. Muslims must plug up the courage
to confront the pharaohs of today in argument.
Author: Sahib
Mustaqim
Bleher |
Date Published:
Spring
1999 |
Back To Top
|
|