|
|
Communal violence between Muslims and Hindus has once again ripped
through the heart of Gujrat. The root cause of the problem seems to be
the Babri Mosque controversy. According to Prem Vora:
"The VHP's position is obviously highly contentious. This issue of
Babri Masjid / Ram-Janam-Bhoomi has indeed aroused the passions of a
large section of the Hindu and Muslim population. The dispute has
exacerbated communal tensions leading to countless riots throughout
northern India, including such tragedies as the Bhagalpur massacre
late last October. Yet, a cursory glance at the evidence would show
that the VHP's Ram- Janam-Bhoomi campaign is based on nothing but
false propaganda.
The VHP refers only to records compiled by the British in the 19th
century. Yet, this "evidence" is only a myth created by the colonial
authorities. They propounded and popularized the belief that an
anti-Hindu Babar demolished the Ram temple. This myth was created to
divide the Hindus and Muslims. The British have not collected any
historical evidence to justify their claim. In fact, the
Archaeological Survey of India has concluded that a "temple to mark
his (Rama's) birthplace was not built on the site of Babri Masjid." There are over a dozen temples in Ayodhya that are claimed to be the
true birth site of Rama." ( Prem Vora, Historical
Facts v VHPs claim, click
here for source).
The facts are startling to say the least. Since you are a British
based organisation, why isn't the British government doing more to
help re-solve this issue. Maybe an apology or just a clarification of
the facts would help calm the situation, something needs to be
done,
this mischevious controversy has already claimed 1000's of lives
and
if it isn't solved soon the death toll will surpass the WTC.
It is true that
history is written by the victors and usually with a purpose in
mind. However, conflicts which focus on particular places or events
usually have more deep-rooted causes, and if the particular issue by
which they are ignited was not there, another one would surely be
found. The issue at stake seems that India claims to be a secular
democracy, but its government and social structures show a clear
religious bias. The British government, having its own bias is
unlikely to speak out in favour of protecting or indeed empowering
the large Muslim minority population in India. Following its own
foreign policy interests as well as echoing the American foreign
policy agenda, the British government sees in India as much of an
ally against a Muslim resurgence as in Israel. The issue is even
more pronounced in the conflict over Kashmir. See also our letter
to Jack Straw, MP.
|
|