THE CONTINUING SUBVERSIVE WAR OF D..M..J.. 

Against divine religion and all moral order 

The on-going subversive war against divine religion and all systems of moral order is best carried out (according to Salman Rushdie) through the novel. Particularly the paperback variety, which he says is far more effective than the medium of film. 

“Film - the most expensive art form is [he says] the least subversive. Bergman, Fellini and others made the most successful secular revolts into the territory of the sacred. I prefer the greater possibilities of the novel.” [The Herbert Read Lectures] Fellini, like Rushdie, incorporated much autobiography into works like ‘La Dolce Vita’. In his famous ‘8 1/2‘ for example, when asked if his own psychological problems corresponded to those of Guido, the hero of the film, Fellini said “I am Guido!” Professor Carolyn Geduld of Indiana University writes, “Guido would retreat into fantasy, a typical reaction of the extrovert who fails to adapt to external conditions.” [Fellini A Life] The magician in Fellini’s 8 1/2 was Ian Dallas alias Abdel Qadir Al-Murabit, the head of the Murabitun Sufi movement. 

All Rushdie’s protestations up to and including his most recent declaration that he had not intended to attack Islam or discredit Muhammad and the Qur’an are patently untrue, and should be totally discounted. His sermon issued through the mouth of his apostle Harold Pinter during the 1990 Herbert Read Memorial lecture entitled “Is nothing Sacred?” confirms his real intention in writing the book, which was, without doubt, one of subversion, and helps to explain the reason for his insistence that the cheaper paperback version comes out. This has nothing at all to do with the principles of free speech, but everything with achieving ubiquitous distribution of the noxious propaganda from his poisoned pen; allowing him the unlimited freedom to extend the range of contaminated fall-out from his particularly subversive guided-missal; a thinly disguised autobiography of the Honorary White Indian Superstar, self-cast in the roll of a born-again atheist, continuing the secular jihad against Islam in particular, and religion in general, in line with the 1885 D..M..J.. speech of Albert Pike and the 1986 instructions of ‘Missile’ Gorbachev to continue the war against all religions in accordance with the secular rules of intolerance drafted by Marx, Nietzsche, the Marquis de’ Sade, Weishaupt, Mazzini, Crowley and Herzl. 

OCCULT-THEOCRASY: D..M..J.. 

A translated extract from a Document addressed to all the Masonic Supreme Councils of Scottish Rites of the World by 
33rd degree Albert Pike 
Delivered in Paris October 1885. 

D..M..J.. 

“ The Order demands the immediate enforcement of the D..M..J.. Nevertheless (Deus Meumque Jus). 

At different epochs of the life of the nations which have the good fortune of possessing an active Supreme Council, and from 1820 onwards, certain similar communications have been made to certain chosen members of the Grand Consistories and Supreme Councils respectively. 

It is necessary to give the secret of this order. 

Exoterically [outwardly] D..M..J.. are the initials of the motto of the 33rd degree: Deus Meumque Jus [= Dieu et mon Droit printed on the cover of every British passport! =God and my right.] 

Esoterically [secretly] D..M..J.. are the initials of the words, Destruction, Materialism, Imposition, which “Impose Destruction of everything which resists Materialism”. 

The three points .. mean that the Masonic work of Destruction, Materialism, and Imposition is triple: 

Consequently the order to enforce practically the D..M..J.. Nevertheless means - 

By every means, whatever they may be, one must Impose first on the Family, and then on the Nation in order to achieve the aim of imposing on Humanity - 

1. The Destruction of Supernaturalism, where the consciece has not been reached by Masonic Materialism. 

2. The Destruction of Authority, where Education has been not reached by Masonic Materialism. 

3. The Destruction of Anti-Masonry, where the State has not been reached by Masonic Materialism." 

[Occult Theocrasy, page 709] 

So much then for their interpretation of enlightenment, which is really ‘darkness visible’, constituting a subversive war against divine religion and all moral order, and an undermining of all material welfare to those who oppose them and their ideas. 

101 years after Pike, Gorbachev enacts the D..M..J.. policy. According to Commander M.J.L. Blake, Royal Navy, and Colonel B.S. Turner C. Eng., M.I. Mech. E., in their observations on the Soviet “War Beneath the Level of Military Conflict”, Gorbachev declared on the 25th of November 1986 to Officials and Military personnel in Uzbekistan that: 

“ There must be no let up in the war against religion, because, as long as religions exist, communism [the secular faith] cannot prevail. We must intensify the destruction of all religions, where ever they are being practiced and taught.” On November 1987 after announcing his Glasnost and Perestroika he said: “In October 1917, we departed the old world and irreversibly rejected it. We are travelling to a new world, the world of communism. We shall never deviate from this path.” [Why has the country not been told, page 5] 

104 years after Pike, Mohammed Boudiaf, 33rd degree freemason, accepted the same motto as Algeria’s undemocratic principle. 

Throughout recorded history believers have been confronted with this sort of intolerance from tyrannical despotic leaders, and are probably nowhere better catalogued, than in the excellent works of Nesta H. Webster, particularly her ‘Secret Societies & Subversive Movements’, published in 1924. In the preface she warns us not to expect any support from the aggressively atheistic and pro-anarchist literary establishment, whose recent darkness has been clearly visible since the debut of Rushdie’s Satanic Verses. 

A SAMPLE OF SATANIC PRESSES 

“It is a matter of some regret to me that I have been so far unable to continue the series of studies on the French Revolution... But the state of the world at the end of the Great War seemed to demand an enquiry into the present phase of the revolutionary movement, hence my attempt to follow its course up to modern times in ‘World Revolution’. And now before returning to that first cataclysm, I have felt impelled to devote one more book to the Revolution as a whole by going this time further back into the past and attempting to trace its origins from the first century of the Christian era. For it is only by taking a general survey of the movement that it is possible to understand any particular phase of its existence. The French Revolution did not arise merely out of the conditions or ideas peculiar to the eighteenth century, nor the Bolshevist Revolution out of political and social conditions in Russia or the teachings of Karl Marx. Both these explosions were produced by forces which, making use of popular suffering and discontent, had long been gathering strength for an onslaught, not only on Christianity, but on all social and moral order. It is of immense significance to notice with what resentment this point of view met in certain quarters. When I first began to write on Revolution a well-known London Publisher said to me:- 

‘Remember that if you take an anti-revolutionary line you will have the whole literary world against you’. 

This appeared to me extraordinary. Why should the literary world sympathise with a movement which from the French Revolution onwards has always been directed against literature, art, and science, and has openly proclaimed its aim to exalt the manual workers over the intelligentsia? ‘Writers must be proscribed as the most dangerous enemies of the people’, said [masonic] Robespierre; his colleague Dumas said, ‘All clever men should be guillotined.’ ... The system of persecution against men of talents was organised...They cried out in sections of Paris, ‘Beware of that man for he has written a book!’ Precisely the same policy has been followed in Russia. Under ‘moderate’ Socialism in Germany the professors, not the ‘people’, are starving in garrets. Yet the whole press is permeated with subversive influences. Not merely in partisan-works, but in manuals of history or literature for use in schools, Burke is reproached for warning us against the French Revolution and Carlyle’s panegyric [eulogy] is applauded. And whilst every slip on the part of an anti-revolutionary writer is seized upon by the critics and held up as an example of the whole [work], the most glaring errors, not only of conclusion but of fact, pass un-challenged if they happen to be committed by a partisan of the [revolutionary] movement. The principle laid down by Collot d’Herbois still holds good: ‘Tout est permis pour quiconque agit dans le sens de la revolution.’ [For an agitator of the revolution, everything is permissable] 

All this was unknown to me when I first embarked on my work. I knew that French writers of the past had distorted facts to suit their own political views [which is now common practice], that a conspiracy of history is still directed by certain influences in the Masonic Lodges and the Sorbonne; I did not know [however] that this conspiracy was being carried on in this country [Great Britain]. Therefore the publishers warning did not daunt me. [I thought naively] If I was wrong either in my conclusions or facts I was prepared to be challenged. Should not years of laborious historical research meet either with recognition or with reasoned and scholarly refutation? But while my book received many generous and appreciative reviews in the press, criticisms which were hostile took a form which I had never anticipated. 

Not a single honest attempt was made to refute either my ‘French Revolution’ or ‘World Revolution’ by the usual methods of controversy; statements founded on documentary evidence were met with flat contradiction unsupported by a shred of counter evidence. In general the plan adopted was not to disprove, but to discredit by means of flagrant misquotation, by attributing to me views I had never expressed, or even by means of offensive personalities. It will surely be admitted that this method of attack is unparalleled in any other sphere of literary controversy. 

It is interesting to notice that precisely the same line was adopted a hundred years ago with regard to Professor Robinson and the Abbe Barruel, whose works on the secret causes of the French Revolution created an immense sensation in their day. The legitimate criticisms that might have been made on their work find no place in the diatribes levelled against them; their enemies content themselves merely with calumnies and abuse. 

An enemy of this same Professor Robinson describing himself as ‘A friend of truth’ wrote in ‘The National Intelligencer’ of January 1801 that Robinson was ‘a man distinguished by abject dependence on a party, by the base crimes of forgery and adultery and by frequent paroxysms of insanity. Adultery was the frequent pastime: Not of Robinson, but of Adam Weishaupt, the chief Iluminist who, on making his sister-in-law pregnant said:- ‘I do not know what devil lead me astray, I who always in these circumstances took extreme precautions.’ Mounier goes even further in one of his pamphlets. Inspired by the Illuminatus Bode, he quotes a story that Robinson suffered from a form of insanity which consisted in his believing that the posterior portion of his body was made of Glass! noted by Seth Payson in his ‘Proofs of the Real Existence and Dangerous Tendency of Illuminism’. (Charleston 1802)

Seth Payson, a contemporary writer thus described some of the illustrations employed to discredit them: [and adds] ‘The testimony of Professor Robinson and Abbe Barruel would doubtless have been considered as ample in any case which did not interest the prejudice and passions of men against them. The scurrility and odium with which they have been loaded is perfectly natural, and what the nature of their testimony would have led one to expect. Men will endeavour to invalidate that evidence which tends to unveil their dark designs. And it cannot be expected that those who believe that ‘the end sanctifies the means’ will be very scrupulous as to their measures’. 

Exactly the same method of attack has been directed against those of us who during the last few years [1924] have attempted to warn the world of the secret forces working to destroy civilisation; in my own case even the plan of accusing me of having attacked British Masonry has been adopted without the shadow of a foundation. From the beginning I have always differentiated between British and Grand Orient Masonry, and have numbered high British Masons amongst my friends. 

But what is the main charge brought against us? Like Robinson and Barruel, we are accused of raising false alarm, of creating a bogey, or of being the victims of an obsession. Up to a point this is comprehensible. Whilst on the continent the importance of secret societies is taken as a matter of course and the libraries of foreign capitals teem with books on the question, people of this country really imagine that secret societies are a thing of the past - articles to this effect appeared quite recently in two leading London Newspapers - whilst practically nothing of any value has been written about them in our language during the last hundred years. Hence ideas that are commonplace on the Continent here appear sensational and extravagant. 

The mind of the Englishman does not readily accept anything he cannot see or even sometimes something he can see which is unprecedented in his experience, so like the Western American farmer confronted for the first time by the sight of a giraffe, his impulse is to shout out angrily: ‘I don’t believe it’. 

Benjamin Disraeli on the other hand stood up in the House of Commons, on July the 14th, in 1856 and made the following pronouncement on the nature and designs of these secret societies and their subversive anti-religious intentions. He said: 

‘There is in Italy a power which we seldom mention in this House... I mean the secret societies... It is useless to deny, because it is impossible to conceal that a great part of Europe, the whole of Italy and France, and a great part of Germany, to say nothing of other countries, is covered with a network of these secret societies, just as the superficies of the earth are covered with railroads. And what are their objects? They do not attempt to conceal them. They do not want constitutional government, they do not want ameliorated institutions... they want to change the tenure of the land, to drive out the present owners of the soil [e.g. Palestine] and put an end to ecclesiastical establishments. Some may even go further.’’ 

Fifty-two years later Disraeli’s prediction proved to be well-founded. In May 1908 the Masonic Trojan Horse re-entered Russia; The Grand Orient of France constituting two Lodges; one in St. Petersburg the other in Moscow; a Chapter Rose Croix was also established in Moscow, and by 1909 there were 6 Lodges which [having served their purpose] soon became dormant, re-opening in 1911 but significantly without rituals, being in the nature of Political Clubs. 

According to the entry on Freemasonry in Russia in Coil’s Masonic Encyclopedia there was a Supreme Council which by 1913-14 had about 40 subordinate bodies. These are credited with inspiring the first revolution in 1917, and it is said that all the members of Kerensky’s Government belonged to them, and there is evidence of a Lodge and even a Grand Lodge existing in the Ukraine in 1919, but [being expendable as in the French Revolution] these were put out of existence by the Communists very soon afterwards. 

Freemasonry was outlawed permanently by Tzar Alexander in August 1822 on the advise of its own Grand Master Kushelev who had warned him that ‘the fraternity was a danger to the State and that it ought to be suppressed or reorganised.’ The decree was renewed by his successor Tzar Nicholas I on April 21st 1826; it is said that secret gatherings continued until 1830; the decree remained in effect until 1930, when it was repealed by Kerensky who according to Coil’s Masonic Encyclopedea later found Asylum in The United States of America, the Mecca of Freemasonry, and was still living there in the late 1950s." [Perhaps Gorbachev will follow] 
[Secret Societies & Subversive Movements, preface] 

ILLUMINISM, LUCIFERIAN ZIONISM, AND FREEMASONRY 

In Life Magazine and Look Magazine of the 16th of January 1962, Mr. David Ben Gurion, Zionist atheist and first prime minister of Israel stated while still in office :- 

“ The image of the world in 1987 as traced in my imagination: The Cold War will be a thing of the past. Internal pressure of the constantly growing intelligentsia in Russia for more freedom and the pressure of the masses for raising their living standards may lead to a gradual democratization of the Soviet Union. [Glasnost and Perestroika were right on time and going according to plan] On the other hand, the increasing influence of the workers and farmers, and the rising Political importance of men of science, may transform the United States into a welfare state with a planned economy. Western and Eastern Europe will become a federation of autonomous states having a Socialist and democratic regime. With the exception of the the U.S.S.R. as a federated Eurasian State, all other continents will become united in a world alliance at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations will build a shrine of the prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah. Higher education will be the right of every person in the world. A pill to prevent pregnancy will slow down the explosive natural increase in China and India. And by 1987 the average life-span of man will reach 100 years.” [The Struggle for World Power, pages 21-22] 

So far only the last item of the plan has failed to materialise, but it can only be a matter of time. David Ben Gurion is reported to having said on another occasion, that while he didn’t believe in God, he thought God believed in him: In this example we see how divine scripture is used to sanctify and justify the secular ambitions of atheists. It is a perfect example of how to engineer success by “working to a plan and planning the work!”, just like Herzl did in his Protocols. 

THE HEART OF THE MATTER: JERUSALEM & THE EDIFICE-COMPLEX 

BUILDING A SHRINE TO THE PROFITS? 

In order for the secular forces of Zionism to gain control of the Holy Land of Palestine, they had to enlist the aid or neutralise the opposition of a very large number of people, particularly those in positions of power and influence: kings, princes, ambassadors, rabbis, bishops and clergy, generals, admirals, police chiefs and policemen, professors, doctors, journalists, bankers, security men, judges, barristers and solicitors, taxi drivers, dustmen and show business personalities, etc. So they employed their oldest and most successful device, the one called freemasonry: ‘a cult of baseless mysteries’ which promises and delivers (for a time at least, some advantages) for those who subscribe to its laudable ideals and plausible spiritual pursuits. And with the French, English and Russian Revolutions to its credit, it would be foolhardy for the ambitious to disregard its significance as a component of world power. No-one trying to understand how world events come about can afford to disregard its unique and undeniable roll. 

The bad news, however, for freemasons who genuinely believe in ‘The Great Architect of the Universe’ is, that neither the Craft Degrees nor the Royal Arch have anything whatsoever to do with either the building or the re-building of King Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem or for that matter anything at all to do with divine happenings in the Holy Land (or indeed anywhere else). It always was and still is an elaborate fraud, designed to deceive even the most sophisticated and educated members of any society, and has been doing so throughout its long and chequered career, which, however defended or described, is irrefutably Satanic in spirit, purpose and practice. The 33rd degree American freemason Alex Horne confirms this in his authoritative book “King Solomon’s Temple in Masonic Tradition”, which completely destroys the myth that freemasonry is predicated on the solid foundations of divine scripture or real estate. 

In chapter two, entitled “Whence came You?”, he says, “But King Solomon’s Temple did not always hold the pre-eminent position it enjoys today, as the legendary base of reference to which practically all our institutions - including our very beginnings - are traditionally assigned. That position, in fact, was once held by the Tower of Babel. Thus, in the very oldest of our old charges - The Regius Manuscript, or Halliwell Poem, said to date about 1390 A.D. - our ‘first most excellent Grand Master’ is declared to have been King Nimrod himself, the builder of that famous tower; and it was he and not King Solomon, who is said to have given the operative Masons of his day [1] their first ‘Charge’, the rule of conduct, and [2] the regulation of the Mason-Craft by which they and their descendants were to be governed. 

This is even more pointedly brought out in some of the later versions of these ‘Old Charges’, the Thistle Manuscript dated 1756, and therefore towards if not beyond the end of the ‘Operative’ period, elaborates upon the simpler account given in the original Regius Manuscript and tells us that Nimrod not only ‘made Masons’ but also ‘taught them signs and tokens’, so that they should distinguish one another from all the rest of mankind." 

WHAT DRIVES MEN TO BUILD TOWERS OF BABEL? 

“ The men who planned to build the tower of Babel were divided into three classes. One said, Let us ascend to heaven and dwell there; another said, Let us ascend and practice idolatry; and the third said, Let us ascend and wage war (against God). The first class God dispersed; the second class, He confused their language; the third class was turned into apes, spirits, demons and night-devils.” [Sanh. 109a, Talmud Everyman edition] 

The Pharaoh of the exodus also suffered from insolence and an edifice complex. Surah 28, al-Qasas (The Story) in the Qur’an, verse 4, informs us that Pharaoh ruled by dividing his subjects into casts and degrees like his predecessor Nimrod, the builder of the infamous tower of Babel. In Verses 38 and 39 it reports that “Pharaoh said:- ‘O Chiefs! I do not know for you any god but myself: therefore O Haman! light me a kiln to bake bricks out of clay and build me a lofty palace, that I may mount up to the god of Moses: But as far as I am concerned, I think Moses is a liar!’ And he was arrogant and insolent in the land, beyond reason, he and his hosts: for they thought they would not have to return to Us!” 

The Qur’an contains all the evidence we need to know about these and earlier worshipers of Sion/Sirius Pro-sion and Betelgeux in the Constellation of Orion the Mighty Hunter: hence the title Sionist or Zionist; Atheists amongst the remnant of Israel, the backsliders, rejecters of revelation, and founders of an occult theocracy, of whom the Qur’an says:- “And when there comes unto them a messenger from Allah, confirming that which they already possess, a party of those who have received the Scripture fling the Scripture of Allah behind their back as if they knew it not. And follow what the evil ones gave out falsely against the power of Solomon: the blasphemers were not Solomon, but the evil ones, teaching men magic, and such things as came down at Babylon to the angels Harut and Marut. But neither of these two taught such things as magic without first saying: ‘We are only a test for you; so do not blaspheme’, and they learned from them the means to sow discord between man and wife. But even so they could not harm any one thus, except by Allah’s permission. And they learned only what harmed them, not what profited them. Even though they knew that the purchasers of magic would have no share of the hereafter.” [Qur’an Surah 2, Al-Baqarah (The Cow), verses 101-2] 

On the Royal Arch, the Qur’an has this to say: “And to Solomon We made the winds obedient.. And we made a font of molten brass to flow for him; and there were jinns that worked in front of him, by the leave of his Lord... They worked for him, as he desired, making arches, images and basons as large as reservoirs...” [Qur’an Surah 34, verse 12-13] 

It should, therefore, come as no surprise to learn that initiates are intentionally mislead in order to conceal the true nature and purpose from all but the chosen few. Otherwise it could not have succeeded the way it has. As Mrs. Webster points out, fascism did not triumph in Italy because it was a reactionary movement, but because it appealed to the noblest instincts in human nature, to patriotism and self-sacrifice, it rallied all elements in a disorganised and disunited nation around the standard of a common cause. She goes on to say: 

“One cannot bring about any great movement without first kindling a sacred fire in the hearts of men; one cannot move masses of people merely by appealing to self interest, they must have a cause to fight for, a cause that is not entirely their own. 

Socialism, whilst enlisting a large proportion of its following by appealing to their baser instincts, has nevertheless, by its false ideals and promises, been able to kindle the fire in many generous hearts, and to persuade deluded enthusiasts that they are working for the welfare of humanity. The only way to combat socialism is to create counter enthusiasm for a true ideal. 

Even Mussolini found that a purely secular ideal was not enough, and that the spirit of religious fervour was necessary to defeat the spirit of materialism and destruction. For behind the concrete forces of revolution - whether Pan-Germanic, Judaic, or Illuminist - beyond that invisible secret circle which perhaps directs them all! is there not yet another force, still more potent, that must be taken into account? 

In looking back over centuries at the dark episodes that have marked the history of the human race from its earliest origins - strange and horrible cults, waves of witchcraft, blasphemies, and desecrations - how is it possible to ignore the existence of an occult power at work in the world?

Individuals, sects, or races fired with the desire of world domination, have provided the fighting forces of destruction, but behind them are the veritable powers of darkness in eternal conflict with the powers of light." 
[Secret Societies & Suversive Movements, page 406] 

When the Great Liar, Dajjal, cannot bring the world under his control by his machinations and false beliefs, the Christian nations will gather under 80 banners [UN] in an attempt to bring peace to the world, but they will fail and bring about its destruction. [Mishkat] 

The beatification of yet another author of Satanic Verse, the late Marquis de’Sade, is already under way by the establishment of one who described himself as being overbearing, domineering, commanding, of angry disposition, licentiously immoral in sexual relationships, disdainful of all accepted rules of decency and convention, and boasted of being atheistic to the point of fanaticism. This, together with the official formation of the Friedrich Nietzsche Admiration Society in the spring of 1990 by Dr. Keith Ansell-Pearson, the London University Politics Lecturer, leaves one in little doubt that the occult establishment is desperate to replace its fallen idols of Marx and Margaret-Forces with even more outrageous, but well tried substitutes. Remember Adolph Hitler derived some of his anti-Semitic thinking from Friedrich Nietzsche’s ideas of the superman. 

In an article in the London Evening Standard in April 1990, Melanie McDonnagh points out that even someone as evil as the Marquis de’Sade is now considered respectable by the liberal establishment and the one-time respectable high street emporiums such as W.H. Smith. She says:- 

“In Britain, the best indication that the divine Marquis has been gently assimilated by the liberalism of the age is probably the fact that his most carefully worked catalogue of cruelty: ‘The 120 Days of Sodom’, has been published in paperback and is now on sale in W.H. Smith.” In this year of his 250th anniversary, the present Marquis de’Sade had this to say about his notorious ancestor, who was, in his opinion:- 

“Ahead of his time. A true liberal whose political ideas are modern [even] today. A lucid thinker who was opposed to the death penalty [no doubt he saw himself as a prospective candidate]. A defender of personal freedom, and citizens’ liberties.” As for his personal philosophy on cruelty, he remarks: “In his time horror was commonplace. He did not invent horror, but had the nerve to record it and play it back.” At the end of the 20th century [he says] authorities at last admit that people can evaluate things for themselves. 

He said, “ The Marquis de’Sade has become a symbol of this new freedom of thought, of the freedom to be ourselves and do what we want.” 

Miss McDonnagh goes on to say that “Ultimately, de’Sade rises above any attempt to redeem him. And his philosophy of self-interest is so thoroughgoing that it defies being bracketed with any other [sorry Salman better luck next time]. The contemporary intellectual fashion [so prevalent today] that it doesn’t matter what you do so long as it doesn’t hurt anyone, quails in the [face of his] rigorous conviction that: 

(a) If you are strong you can do what you like, and (b) that even if humanity destroys itself in the resulting anarchy that follows, it doesn’t particularly matter." 

But what else can be expected from a person who described himself 250 years ago as being “imperious, choleric, irascible with a dissolute imagination the like of which was never seen, and atheistic to the point of fanaticism.” 

Nicolas Walter, managing director of the Rationalist Press Association, in his book ‘Blasphemy Ancient & Modern’, says: “ The Marquis de’Sade, who is well known for the extreme obscenity of his pornographic fantasies, is less well known for their extreme profanity.” He says his most objectionable novel was Juliette (1797). 

Friedrich Nietzsche was not a lot better. Nietzsche, according to the New Encyclopedia, is described as follows: “Nietzsche, Friedrich, German Philosopher, born at Rocken, in Prussian Saxony, Oct. 15th 1844. At the age of 25 he was appointed professor of philology at the University of Basel. Here he lectured until in 1879 ill health compelled him to resign. [He was declared clinically insane.] He died August 25th, 1900. 

Essentially a poet, Nietzsche never framed a philosophy. He heatedly attacked pity and humanitarianism; and, on the ground that it had introduced these things into Europe, bitterly assailed Christianity." [The Modern Encyclopedia] 

In some respects Friedrich Nietzsche may be even worse than the notorious Marquis de’Sade, but either way it is hard to understand how ‘modern’ men and women of putative intelligence can harbour any interest, let alone respect and admiration, for the ideas, beliefs and activities of either Nietzsche or de’Sade; except perhaps out of joint psychiatric curiosity or interest in the pair’s mutual insanity. But in the aftermath of Satanic Verses it is only to be expected that there will be renewed popularity for these earlier heroes of Satanic inspiration - issued via the whispering ventriloquies of the soul and altogether consistent with cases of possession and psychotic schizophrenia, with its imperious choleric irascibility, dissolute imaginings, obscene outbursts, violent behaviour, blasphemous outpourings and fervent proclamations of devout fanatical atheism; the bedrock of all ‘pornographic fantasies’ including some of Rushdie’s works. 

And yet we are now expected to take seriously the philosophical aberrations of these delinquent, degenerated, disintegrated personalities and to regard them as worthy of serious consideration and possible emulation, as if the passage of time alone had rendered virtuous their insanity or deplorable conduct; or that either could possess worthwhile contributions for the problems of our time [except perhaps as examples of what caused them in the first place, as these problems are caused in the most part by academics and their apologists being allowed to pass-off their vacuous philosophical irrelevancies as the well trodden paths to wisdom and learning, rather than the dead-ends they are, unworthy of even cursory pursuit]. 

What seems to be at work is the well known rule of marketing; the one that states “first create the demand, or endorse it, then monopolise the market.” Or in the words of J. Dodds Esq., “look for the earner.” Many academics are as notoriously ambitious as any inside trader, and will promote any idea likely to advance either their career, academic standing or financial status. 

So on the question of either the veracity of a particular philosopher or the reliability of his sources of reference and inspiration, when deemed advantageous or when cornered, our intellectual will often resort to what we have come to call academic amnesia, which is particularly evident at times of council grievances when members of staff, academic or otherwise, are asked to give evidence against a head of department or say anything that may bring them into conflict with influential members of the administration. The author has personal experience of representing students at council grievances at the universities of Sheffield and Bradford, and on occasions found some members of the academic, administrative and technical staff committing perjury, contradicting taped evidence, and officials of the students’ union delaying vital evidence against the interests of their own students, even though the head of department was considered to be mentally unbalanced by senior academic staff. He had in fact forcefully reversed a successful Ph.D. external examination of one of the Egyptian students in his own department because of a 20 year vendetta between himself as the head of department and an Indian supervisor on his own staff. 

The present bunch of academics and members of the liberal establishment certainly have promotion high on their list of priorities, and with that on their minds virtually anything goes!, even if it involves trying to convince the world at large that mad is beautiful; like Ivan Boesky who said, “I want you to know that greed is good”. Therefore, it comes as no surprise to hear them propose that a package of mutual insanity might be well worth a try, a sort of philosophical chemotherapy hair-of-the-dog approach to life might somehow work. 

But the academic heirs to these two particular mad dogs, Nietzsche and the Marquis de’Sade, are beginning to show all the characteristic symptoms of philosophical rabies, which we hope will result in the population avoiding contact with those suffering from M.A.D. (Mad Academics Disease), by adopting a once bitten twice shy approach. 

THE MAN WHO THOUGHT HE WAS GOD 

Admiration Society On The Way For The Man Who Thought He Was God. So wrote Barry Hugill in The Observer: 

“One hundred years after being pronounced clinically insane, Friedrich Nietzsche is again emerging as a modern cult figure. Two hundred devotees filled London’s Goethe Institute last week for the official formation of Britain’s first Nietzsche Society. 

Since his death in 1900, he has been accused of many things, mostly unpleasant, but never of modesty. He lived in fear of being considered ordinary. ‘I am no man, I am dynamite,’ he proclaimed, but added that his followers should not consider him ‘holy’. 

This from a philosopher who said: ‘There cannot be a God because, if there were one, I would not believe that I was not he.’ Anglo-Saxon philosophers were apt to dismiss him at best as an early, flawed exponent of existentialism, and at worse as a Nazi. Most regarded him as Bonkers. 

For reasons not absolutely clear, a Nietzsche revival has hit British and American Universities. In the last six months, sales of the paperback ‘Nietzsche Reader’ have doubled, a spate of articles has appeared in the learned press, the doyen of British philosophy, Bernard Williams, has written favourably about him, and the American commentator Stanley Rosen declared Nietzsche the ‘most influential philosopher in the Western World’ [heaven forbid]. 

R.J. (Reg) Hollingdale, the English translator of Nietzsche, is cheerfully baffled by the revival. As the likely first president of the society, he has good reason to celebrate, having just received a bumper royalties cheque. ‘They say it’s to do with the decline of Marxism, but it doesn’t sound convincing, does it? [it does] I’m not complaining, though. Nietzsche won’t make me rich, but he’s doing me very nicely thank you.’ [moral to the story: always look for the earner] 

Dr. Keith Ansell-Pearson, the London University Politics Lecturer who convened Monday’s inaugural meeting, suspects the renewed interest stems from the collapse of Communism and talk of a Federated Europe. Nietzsche he said, was an anti-nationalist who looked to the creation of a Europe without borders. 

This is an unusual claim. More orthodox reading of ‘Thus Spake Zarathustra’ or ‘The Birth of Tragedy’ reveal a man who hated socialism, was intolerant of female emancipation, favoured a rigid social hierarchy and had an unhealthy pre-occupation with blood: - ‘Of all that is written I love only that which is written with blood. Write with blood and you will discover that blood is spirit.’ 

Dr. Ansell-Pearson accepts that his hero has had a bad press. He concedes that many people identify Hitler’s Aryan racial theories to Nietzsche’s ‘Superman.’ A philosopher who apparently extols an irrational lust to rule must expect to be misunderstood. However! he feels that Friedrich was one of the good guys??? 

Dr. Ansell-Pearson hopes to rehabilitate him as a nineteenth century ‘anti-racist, anti-nationalist’, a rebel who challenged orthodoxy and was reviled by those in power for so doing, a man to be read for ‘the sheer pleasure to be had from his joyful wisdom’???" 
[The Observer, May 6th, 1990] 

If Nietzsche’s reward for following his own philosophy is anything to go by, it bodes ill for those who intend to follow suit. Although people like Bernard Williams, Reg. Hollingdale and Dr. Ansell-Pearson will all receive money and the approbation of the occult liberal establishment, Nietzsche was in a state of mental and physical collapse for the last decade of his life, and this is all the pleasure and joy to be gained out of his sort of wisdom. 

The co-founder of the Nietzsche Society, art critic Michael Newman, believes the Nietzsche cult can be partially explained by his eclecticism [drawing ideas from every school]: “You can get what you want out of him.” Nietzsche may have foreseen his own revival, says Hugill, when he said: “My time has not yet come either; I was born posthumously.” 

Most people, even the non-religious, know the Bible story of the cretion and fall of Adam and the events succeding it together with the murder of Abel by his brother Cain, and it therefore requires little or no introduction. But the subsequent events such as the revenge of Seth are little known or discussed even among those who come from a Judeo-Christian or Islamic background, amongst whom the story is an essential canon of faith. But what is more astonishing and central to the core of our investigation is the fact that this same story turns up in the accounts and the stories of pagan mythology, in particular those of Egypt which have continued to fascinate practically every subsequent civilisation and secret society right up to the present day. 

Like the Bible, The Qur’an in several accounts reports on the creation. In its 20th chapter or surah entitled “ Ta Ha” [quoted earlier on page 92], the Qur’an informs us of the events prior to and following the creation of Adam, his covenant with his Creator, his appointment as vice regent over all creation, the refusal of Satan to submit himself to Adam’s authority, Adam’s enviable standard of living in the garden of paradise and his subsequent eviction due to his desire to become equal with Allah in power and immortality. The Quranic scripture either expands, corrects, or corroborates the much earlier accounts contained in the Torah or Pentateuch (the first five books of the Old Testament, revealed to Moses, peace be upon him), which also, clearly establish Satan as the first rebel and anarchist, the one who destroys the idyllic lifestyle of Adam and continues to prevent his offspring from re-experiencing the blissful life they genetically recall and naturally long for, by encouraging humanity to pursue the misguided notions that they can regain or re-create the paradise-lost, by adopting an ‘anything and everything goes’ approach to life, by completely disregarding all the necessary and well proven guidelines for humanity’s common good and peace of mind. 

“And verily We made a covenant of old with Adam, but he forgot, and We found no constancy in him. 

And when We said to the angels: fall prostrate before Adam, they fell prostrate all except Iblis; who refused. 

Therefore we said: O Adam! this is an enemy unto you and to your wife. So let him not drive you both out of the garden so that you have to toil. 

It is vouched safe unto you that you will not hunger there nor will you feel naked. Nor will you feel thirst or exposure to the sun’s heat. 

But the Devil whispered to him saying: O Adam! Shall I show thee the tree of immortality and Power that wastes not away? 

Then the two ate thereof, so that their shame became apparent unto them, and they began to hide by heaping on themselves some of the leaves of the Garden. And Adam disobeyed his Lord, and so went astray. 

Then his Lord chose him, and relented toward him, and guided him. He said: Go down here, both of you, one of you a foe unto the other. But if there comes unto you guidance from Me, then who so ever follows My guidance, he will not go astray or come to grief. 

But he who turns away from remembrance of Me, his will be a narrow life, and I shall bring him blind to the assembly on the Day of Resurrection. He will say My Lord! why have you brought me forth blind when previously I could see ? 

He will say: So should it be. Our revelations came to you but you did forget them. In like manner you are forgotten this day. Thus do we reward him who is prodigal and believes not in the Revelations of his Lord; and verily the doom of the Hereafter will be sterner and more lasting. 

Is it not a guidance for them to know how many generations we destroyed before them, amid whose dwellings they walk? Behold! therein verily are signs for men of thought. 

And had it not been for a decree that has already gone forth from thy Lord, and a term already fixed, the judgment by now would have been inevitable." (Qur’an Surah 20, Ta-Ha, verses 115-129) 

Even after 1400 years have elapsed, we can see from the above Quranic account that nothing has happened in the intervening centuries to contradict its confident statements, that all generations consistently fail to learn wisdom from the foolish experiments of their predecessors and are therefore destined to repeat them by falling between the two stools of Pride and Shyness:- Pride with its egocentric desire to prove that ‘the rules don’t apply to it because of its unique individuality’ with its insatiable longing to be unjustifiably admired, will often resort to outrageously un-fashionable behaviour or flamboyant self-destructive antics in order to gain the world’s attention, or try to come ostentatiously first in practically anything, notorious or noteworthy. On the other hand, shyness with all its inhibitions makes the person too bashful to ask, if, by so doing, it risks exposing its unworldliness to the ridicule and scorn of a callous world. And once again the stage is set for yet another disasterous re-run of history.

THE CITIES OF CITIZEN CAIN 

Mankind’s perennial inability (for what ever reason) to evaluate its abysmal track record and the disastrous achievements of its predecessors - who through similar thinking or simple shyness assumed falsely that their hearts’ desires could be attained by recklessly dispensing with all conventional wisdom and learning, like anarchist Rabaud de Saint-Etienne who said: “Everything, yes, everything must be destroyed, since everything must be remade” - brought about through this process of Satanic thinking the crusades, the Spanish inquisition, the English, French and Bolshevik revolutions, World Wars I and II, in fact all past present and future conflicts. 

Conflicts which from the creation of Adam until today, have been the result of man’s ambition to make himself equal with God, or like Nietzsche, to create God in his own image; or to proclaim, like Marx and Ben-Gurion, that there is no God and therefore man has no further need for moral laws. Man thus demonstrates his disdain by propagating ideas of complete freedom from conscience, and to think and act in absolute disregard and opposition to all the well established and necessary laws required for the maintenance of civil, moral and natural order, which has resulted in the environmental catastrophy, and global chaos we see all around us. Rebellious ideas which invariably lead to the mass worship of devilish leaders who advocate these insane theories and who, unfortunately, are followed by the masses who, as previously stated, are either too shy or too proud to announce that the king has no clothes or to ask him by what irrational authority he says that there is no god but scientific man. 

It is worth reminding ourselves again of the words of Bukharin, Karl Marx’s associates in the ‘First International’, an anarchist and Satanist who wrote: “Satan is the first free-thinker and saviour of the world. He frees Adam and impresses the seal of humanity and liberty on his forehead by making him disobedient.” [Mystery 666, page ] 

It comes, therefore, as no surprise to find many of these same characters and similar stories turning up throughout history in one form or another in practically all the various competing ideologies and schools of religious and quasi-religious thought, from ancient Babylon to the present day; With Ancient Egypt exercising tremendous influence on today’s Judeo-Christian Masonic world order, with the worship of Osiris or substitute crucified son of God, betrayed and murdered by his brother or close disciple, who in turn is killed by the son of Osiris and his sister Isis. A cunning and effective device for subverting and misleading subsequent generations by passing off false ideas and doctrine under the name or guise of a divine messenger or prophet of Allah, a process which can best be described as being one of the ancient process of head swapping [generic engineering] which has always succeeded for the simple reason, that for a lie to consistently succeed it must always contain an element of truth. And succeed it does until the whole truth comes along and unmasks it. “ The truth has come and falsehood has vanished. And falsehood [by its nature] is ever bound to vanish.” [Qur’an, Surah 17, Al-Isra’ (The Night Journey), verse 81] 

The Qur’an also informs us that “ Those who break the covenant of Allah after ratifying it, and sever that which He ordered to be joined, and who make mischief in the earth; those are they who are the losers.

How can you disbelieve in Allah when you were once without life and He created and gave life to you! and He will return you once again to death and then resurrect you to life once more and then unto Him you will return [for assessment and judgment of your behaviour]. He it is Who created for you all that is in the earth, then He turned to the heaven, and fashioned it as seven heavens, and He is the Knower of all things. 

And when your Lord said unto the angels: I am about to place a viceroy in the earth, they said: will You place there one who will do harm therein and will shed blood, while we, hymn Your praise and sanctify You? He said, surely I know that which you know not.

And He taught Adam the names of all things then showed them to the angels for identification saying: inform of the names of these [objects] if you are truthful. They said: Be You glorified! we have no knowledge except that which You have taught us. Lo! You, only You are the Knower, the Wise. 

He said: O Adam! inform them of the names of these things, and when he had informed them of their names, He said: did I not tell you that I alone know the secrets of the heavens and the earth? and I know that which you disclose and that which you hide. 

But when We said to the angels: prostrate yourselves before Adam (My viceregent), all angels fell prostrate except Iblis/Satan who refused through pride, and thus became a disbeliever. We said, o Adam! live with your wife in the garden, and eat freely of its fruits where ever you will; but come not near to this tree in case you become wrong doers. But [the rebellious spirit] Satan lured them out of their idyllic state and caused Us to expel them; and We said: ‘fall down, each of you a foe unto the other! there will be for you on earth a habitation and a provision for a time’. 

Then Adam received words of revelation from his Lord, and He relented towards him, for He (Allah) is the Relenting the Merciful. We said: ‘go down, all of you, from here; but verily there will come unto you guidance from Me; and who ever follows My guidance, no fear shall come upon them, nor shall they grieve. But they who disbelieve, and deny Our (guidance through) revelation, such are the rightful owners of the fire, they will abide therein.’ 

O Children of Israel! remember My favour where with I favoured you, and fulfill your (part of the) covenant, I shall certainly fulfill Mine, and fear Me, and believe in that which I reveal (in this Qur’an), confirming that which you already possess (in the Torah and Gospels), and be not the first to deny it, neither sell My communications for a miserable price, and fear Me alone." 

[Qur’an, Surah 2, Al-Baqarah (The Cow), verses 27-54] 

Regrettably, the Children of Ishmael have also sold Allah’s communications for less than the Children of Israel sold theirs. In fact they gave them away to run after the Pied Piper of Washington who by the mid-50s used Jazz as the vehicle. Miles Copeland was a riverboat gambler and jazz pianist before he worked for the CIA. It was his idea to look for a Moslem Billy Graham, a new African prophet who would turn that continent to serve the interests of the United States. Someone who would get the black majority to turn the other cheek and accept the US administration’s racist idea that “we are the masters and you shine our shoes”. More on that in the next chapter. 

Next: The Unacceptable Face of Zionism

Table of Contents Acknowledgements Prelude Preface Introduction Chronology The Rushdie Report Sadistic Acts : Satanic Nurses Chutzpah : The Shameless Impudence Satanic Purses Carved Turkey Guilt - Edged Insecurity Generic Engineering The Revolt Against Islam The Continuing Subersive War of D.M.J The Unacceptable Face of Zionism The Unheeded Warnings The Luciferian Doctrine Unmasking Jehovah Jah-Bul-On Appendix Bibliography

Download Entire Book -  PDF Format (842kb)  Word Format (657kb)