Gorst’s telegram of the 23rd
April about the rumored appointment of Mohamed Farid as delegate in
Egypt of the Constantinople Freemasons, “said to be intimately connected with the committee
of Union and Progress”, prompts me to write to you at some
length on the strain of continental Freemasonry running through
the Young Turk movement.
I do
so privately and confidentially, as this new Freemasonry in
Turkey, unlike that of England and America, is in great part
secret and political, and information on the subject is only
available in strict confidence, while those who betray its
political secrets seem to stand in fear of the hand of the
Mafia. Some days ago a local Mason who divulged the signs of
the craft was actually threatened with being sent before a
court-martial, sitting in virtue of our state of siege.
As
you are aware, the Young Turkey movement in Paris was quite
separate from and in great part in ignorance of the inner
workings of that in Salonica. The latter has a population of
about 140,000, of whom 80,000 are Spanish Jews, and 20,000 of
the sect of Sabetai Levi (zevi) or Crypto-Jews, who externally
profess Islamism. Many of the former have in the past acquired
Italian Nationality and are Freemasons affiliated to Italian
Lodges. Nathan, the Jewish Lord Mayor of Rome, is high up in
Masonry, and the Jewish Premiers Luzzati and Sonnino, and
other Jewish senators and deputies, are also, it appears,
Masons. They claim to have been founded from and to follow the
ritual of the “Ancient Scottish.”
...The inspiration of the movement in Salonica would
seem to have been mainly Jewish [Atatürk also came from
Salonica], while the words “Liberté,” “Equalité”, and
“Fraternité”, the motto of the young Turks, are also the
device of Italian Freemasons... Shortly after the revolution
in July 1908, when the Committee established itself in
Constantinople, it soon became known that many of its leading
members were Freemasons... it was noticed that Jews of all
colours, native and foreign, were enthusiastic supporters of
the new dispensation, till, as a Turk expressed it, every
Hebrew became a potential spy of the occult (Balkan)
Committee, and people began to remark that the movement was
rather a Jewish than Turkish Revolution..."
The
Gorst, mentioned by Sir Gerard Lowther to Sir Charles Harding
was none other than Sir Eldon Gorst, who in 1907 had replaced
Lord Cromer as Chief British Agent and Consul-General in
Cairo, a post Cromer had held from 1883. Gorst had good reason
to be concerned about the activities of the “Committee of
Union and Progress”, because, according to ‘The Times History
of The War’, [Vol 3, pages 281-3], during his tenure of office
the Christian Premier, Butros Pasha Ghali, was assassinated by
a student connected with that same Judeo- Masonic
organisation, which as we now know, according to Sir Gerard
Lowther, was serving strictly Jewish ambitions. The ‘Times
History’ goes on to say:- “After the sadly premature death of
Sir Eldon Gorst, Lord Kitchener was appointed in his stead.”
Sir
Eldon Gorst, it seems, was instructed to avoid friction and
“incidents.” He attempted a policy of conciliation which
apparently did not meet with success. He was nevertheless able
to detatch the Khedive from the Extremist Nationalist Party
and curb the licence of the extremist press. After the
appointment of Kitchener, it says, the extremist Nationalists
lost ground and fled to Turkey, but the Khedive and the
Ottoman Special Mission continued their intrigues. Sedition
was scotched, but not killed. It does not mention how, when
and where Gorst died.
DEBT ON THE NILE
The
reason for Britain being in Egypt, was as usual material
self-interest. Having opposed the Suez Canal project to begin
with, once it had become a fact of commercial life, the City
of London had to make sure it was not held to ransom by the
French. The ‘Times History’ states:
“Great Britain had been opposed to the construction of
the Suez Canal, which opened a new and shorter route to India
to the Mediterranian Powers. Its completion made the fate of
Egypt largely dependent on the will of the leading Sea Power -
Britain.
In
1857 Lord Beaconsfield [Disraeli] purchased [with the aid of
the Rothschilds] 176,602 original founders’ shares from the
[financially] embarrassed Khedive. England having thus
acquired a definite stake in the country was bound to
intervene both in the management of the Canal and in the
organization of Egyptian Finance.
The
problem of Ottoman-Egypt, like Ottoman-Turkey itself, was one
of indebtedness to the European Powers, primarily France and
England. The Khedive, like the Sultan, was heavily in debt,
and having become financially embarrassed was forced to sell
his shares [but not necessarily] to Lord Beaconsfield in 1875.
The
Khedive was deposed by the Sultan of Turkey in 1879, with
anarchy resulting under his successor Tewfik, with military
mutiny inspired partly by the very real grievances against
foreign usurers and corrupt officials. Great Britain
intervened on behalf of the Khedive and restored order at
Tel-el-Kebir in 1882... There were indeed several occassions
on which her statesmen contemplated the withdrawal of the Army
of Occupation, but after the failure of the Anglo-Turkish
negotiations of 1886-1887 it was recognised that this could
only be effected, if at all, after many years.
Inspite of the jealousy of France, whose politicians
had allowed themselves to be manoeuvered into an attitude of
hostility towards England by Germany, the hostility of
reactionary elements and of the Khedive Abbas II., who
succeeded his father Tewfik in 1892, the financial bondage in
which Egypt was held by international jealousies, the abuse...
and the fact that none of the Great Powers had definitely
recognised our special position and interests in Egypt, our
influence increased.
...Six years later came the Anglo French agreement of
happy augury, by which France, in return for concessions in
Morocco and elsewhere, recognised England’s special interests
in Egypt, while England undertook to make no change in the
political status of the country. The other European Powers,
except, of course, Turkey, some sooner, some later, recognised
the occupation..."
Egypt, it must be remembered, was still part of the
Ottoman- Islamic Empire. And the Khedive only ruled by the
Firman of 1879. He was not empowered to sell off the family
silver or the Suez Canal.
“The
Khediveate was hereditary in the House of Muhammad Ali
according to the law of primogeniture. But the same Firman
debarred the Khedive from the raising of loans without the
consent of the Sultan, and of keeping an army of more than
18,000 men in time of peace, nor could he conclude any treaty
beyond certain commercial conventions with any Foreign Power.
At the Sublime Porte Egypt was regarded as an autonomous
Ottoman province ruled by an hereditary Govenor-General
appointed by the Sultan, though possessed of greater
independence than other Ottoman ‘Valis’.”
It seems hardly surprising that the Caliph of Islam was
upset by these carryings on, and it is also clear that no
government should ever borrow any money from foreigners to
conduct public works, like the Suez canal. It should always
increase its own domestic money supply at zero interest and
end up with assets and not liabilities, which give those same
foreign powers a built-in time bomb, which could be activated
when a pretext was required to invade and occupy a country.
The events described here were also predicted by the last
Prophet of Islam - Muhammad, who warned that the forces of
Anti-Christ would come and divide their lands like a roasted
sheep at a feast, or in this case - carved Turkey? The entire
world is now at the mercy of these same ‘Banksters’, not only
the Islamic community. The New World Order is just the old one
in disguise.
The
Judeo-Masonic machinations of Turkey’s Finance minister and
betrayal of Palestine have yet to be fully investigated
together with those of the Bahai Movement, and if not all,
most of the current Sufi movements. Sheikh Abdel Kadir al
Murabit alias Sheikh Abdel Kader as-Sufi (aka Ian Dallas) is
now promoting Nietzsche amongst his followers, and in the
light of their history the Sufi groups with Turkish links are
to be viewed with some scepticism.
Sir
Gerard’s warning from his vantage point at the British Embassy
in Constantinople endorses Lady Queenborough’s contention that
the powers that had taken over Turkey constituted an Occult
(Masonic) Theocrasy. In her book of that title, in the section
concerned with Associations of the 20th Century, Chapter
CXIII, page 585, entitled ‘The Young Turk Movement’, she makes
the following observation:-
“Not
till 1900, when the Grand Orient virtually took over the Young
Turk Party which was composed chiefly of Jews, Greeks and
Armenians, did this movement assume a serious aspect.”
Vicomte Leon de Poncins in ‘The Secret Powers behind
the Revolution’ [page 66], giving the history and origin of
the ‘Young Turk’ Movement, adds the following information,
taken from the Masonic organ of the Grand Orient:-
“The
Acacia (October 1908) A secret Young Turk council was formed and
the whole movement was directed from Salonica. Salonica, the
most Jewish town in Europe - 70,000 Jews out of a population
of 100,000 - was specially suited for the purpose. It already
contained several Lodges, in which the revolutionaries could
work without being disturbed. These Lodges are under the
Protection of European diplomacy. And as the Sultan was
without weapons against them, his fall was inevitable... On
the 1st May, 1909, the representatives of 45 Turkish Lodges
met in Constantinople and founded the ‘Grand Orient Ottoman’.
Mahmoud Orphi Pasha was nominated Grand Master...
A
short time after a Supreme Council of the Ancient and Accepted
Scottish Rites was also founded and recognised by the French
and Italian authorities." [In April 1908 Tel Aviv was founded]
According to Coil’s Masonic Encyclopedea, The Grand
Orient of France and Italy [preparing for the onslaught
against the strongly Christian Caliphate of Russia]
established similar Lodges in St Petersburg and other cities,
which provided a similar networking platform in the Bolshevik
Revolution. Kerenski’s entire government were members. These
lodges were closed in 1911, but re-opened again to carry out
their original objectives, as pure political clubs without
rituals.
“To
complete this information”, says Lady Queenborough, “we may
add that two of the Salonica lodges, those of Macedonia and
Labour & Lux were connected with the Grand Orient of Italy
and France.”
The
above extracts, are from official documents, one from Sir
Gerard Lowther of the British Embassy in Constantinople, the
other, from an official Masonic publication. Both confirm that
the City of Constantinople fell to an army of between 70,000
and 80,000 occult Masonic Jews and 20,000 crypto-Muslim Jews,
without a shot being fired.
Furthermore these events were clearly foretold by the
Prophet Muhammad 1300 years beforehand, who also warned of The
Great War within 6 years of its occurence, with the emergence
of the Anti- Christ one year later.
In
Sahih Muslim, Abu Hurairah reported that the Prophet Muhammad
inquired: Have you heard of a city, of which part is in the
sea? Yes, they said [understanding him to mean
Constantinople]. He said: “ The Last Hour shall not occur
until 70,000 of the children of Isaac shall attack it. When
they will come to it they will land down, but they will not
fight with arms, nor shower it with arrows. They will only
say: ‘There is no god but Allah, and Allah is the Greatest’,
and one of its sides will fall. They will recite it for the
second time: ‘There is no god but Allah, and Allah is The
Greatest’, and another side of the city will fall. Afterwards
they will recite for a third time: ‘There is no god but Allah,
and Allah is the Greatest’, and then it will be opened to
them, and they will enter it and acquire booty. While they
will be dividing the spoils, a proclaimer will come to them
and say: Verily Dajjal/Anti-Christ has come out. Then they
will leave everything and return.”
In
Mishkat al-Masabih another Hadith is quoted with the following
addition: “Within six years look to ‘The Great War’. Then
after one more year the emergence of the Dajjal (or
Anti-Christ) and Revolution which would enter every Arab
House, followed by mutual hostility between the Arabs.”
Within six years of the ‘Young Turk’ revolution of 1908
and the fall of Constantinople to the 70,000 Jews as
prophecied, the Great War began on schedule. By November 1st
1914, Britain had declared war on Turkey - within the time
frame specified by The Prophet Muhammad - peace be upon him.
Other significant events resulting from the fall of the
Islamic Caliphate and the rise of the Jewish Caliphate are as
follows:-
On
January 5th 1915 the Turkish army was defeated in the
Caucasus. On August 29th Italy declared war on Turkey. On
December 13th French and British troops occupied Salonika. The
Arab Uprising in 1916, the Balfour declaration in 1917, and
the Bolshevik revolutions in the same year, brought with them
terror on a massive scale. Following the fall of Jerusalem on
December 9th 1917, came the destruction of the Turkish army at
Megido (Armageddon) on September 19th 1918, culminating in the
‘Peace to end all peace’- conferences on January 18th 1919,
and here again we see the same well-tried conspiracies at
work.
Before moving on, I wish to give a third and final
account of the Young ‘Turk’ revolution. This time from ‘The
Times History of the War’ [Vol XIV, Chapter CCXVII, page 308].
This establishes conclusively and contrary to Professor Norman
Cohn’s statements in ‘Warrant for Genocide’ that there is and
always was a Judeo-Masonic Conspiracy with a strong
anti-Islamic, anti-Orthodox Judeo/Christian tendency at work
in the world; responsible for all past and present trials and
tribulations.
The
Times History says:- “In European Turkey the Spanish Jews, or
Sephardim, as they call themselves, found two conditions
essential for their prosperity - a benevolent government and a
country in a low state of economic development. They settled
in the chief commercial centres - Constantinople, Uskub,
Sarajevo and above all Salonika - and rapidly supplanted
Greeks, Venetians, Genoese and Ragusans.”
WANDERING JEWS
“
The settlement of the Sephardim in Rumelia was a noteworthy
epoch in the history of the Jews, for it marked the first
retracing of their steps in the direction of Zion. But these
Sephardim never girded themselves for the final stages of the
road.”
“Salonika, with its 80,000 Jews [70,000. on page 11,
Vol XII] speaking their inherited Spanish dialect, was already
a Jewish home; and who could expect a Jew, with his history of
wandering behind him, to abandon lightly so fair an asylum?
Loyalty and material interest combined to make the Sephardim
stay where they were and stand by the Turks. They became
linked to the Turks more intimately through a crypto-Jewish
Moslem community, the Dönme, descended from Sephardim
converted in the seventeenth century.”
“The
Dönme were represented by [Turkey’s finance minister] Djavid
Bey, the financier, on the Committee of Union and Progress,
and through Oriental Free Masonry, which they controlled, the
Salonika Sephardim were associated from the beginning with the
Young Turkish movement. In Turkey as in Hungary, and from the
same mixed motives of gratitude and ambition, they threw in
their lot with the ruling race, and they supplied the
intellectual element in the new Turkish Nationalism.”
“The
author of the standard exposition of the ‘Pan-Turanian
Movement’, who calls himself by the pure Turkish name of
‘Tekin Alp’, is believed to have been a Salonika Jew; and
there is also reason to suppose that the secularising,
anti-Islamic tendency which is so remarkable a feature in
Pan-Turanianism was partly the effect of this Jewish
influence.” 80
In
1881 the Ottoman Debt had been consolidated and reduced to
£160,000,000 Sterling. It was administered by a commission of
the Public Debt, representing the creditors and under the
control of France and England. The Commission ran the State
Monopolies on Salt, Tobacco, etc., as well as the collection
of various taxes. “ The whole system impaired Turkey’s
sovereign rights.” [The Diaries of Theodor Herzl, page
139]
On
June 17th 1896, on the Orient Express, that other wandering
Jew, Theodor Herzl wrote in his Diaries: “Nevlinski believes
that the Sultan’s only salvation lies in an alliance with the
Young Turks - who for their part are on good terms with the
Macedonians, Cretans, Armenians, etc., and in putting through
reforms with their help. He had given this counsel to the
Sultan in a report.
I [Theodor Herzl] said, that in addition to this
program he should provide with Jewish help, the means to carry
it out.”
“Let the Sultan give us that parcel of land
[Palestine] and in return we would set his house in order,
regulate his finances, and influence world opinion in his
favour...”
“Unprepared as I was, I merely said to him that we were
figuring that we could give some 20 million pounds for
Palestine...We devoted 20 million Turkish pounds towards the
regularisation of the Turkish finances. Of that sum we give
two millions in exchange for Palestine - the amount being
based on a capitalisation of its present annual revenue
(T80,000). With the remaining 18 millions we free Turkey from
the European-controlled Commission.” [Sir Vincent Henry
Pensalver Caillard was one of the heads of the Ottoman Public
Debt Council]
“The
first four categories of bond-holders are induced by the
privileges we grant them - viz: increased rates of interest,
extension of amortisation period, etc. - to agree to the
suppression of the Commission.” [The Diaries of Theodor Herzl,
pages 140-141]
The
above confirms the following statement by the former Bank of
England director Lord Stamp: “Banking was conceived in
iniquity and born in sin. Bankers own the earth. Take it away
from them, but leave them with the power to create credit, and
with a flick of the pen they will create enough money to buy
it all back again. Take this power away from them, and all the
great fortunes like mine would disappear, and they ought to
disappear, for then this world would be a happier and better
world to live in. But if you wish to remain the slaves of
bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then continue to
let bankers control money and control credit.”
Any
organisation or individual wishing to reprint or copy the contents
of this website may do so as long as the information is kept in its
original form, names of all authors and sources are kept intact and
is used for non-malicious purposes. An acknowledgement and link to
this website would be HIGHLY appreciated.
